AMD FirePro W4300 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+143%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
DG2-128
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
