Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +1685%
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
1
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Cedar
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy