Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +228%
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
5
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Oland
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
26W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy