Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +125%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Tahiti
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy