Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +659%
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
768
Shading Units
72
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GT215
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy