CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
VS
AMD FirePro W4300
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
+750%
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
VS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
RV630
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W4100
2
AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FireStream 9370
3
AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM
4
AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
5
AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W5100
6
AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
7
AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
8
AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
9
AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI FirePro 2260 PCI
10
AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy