Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +750%
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
RV630
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy