Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +16%
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
1.229 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2012
FirePro
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1229 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
307.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Tahiti
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy