Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +17%
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy