Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 DVI vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD FirePro W5000 DVI vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 DVI and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 DVI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000 DVI
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +163%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy