Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD FirePro W5100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5100
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +186%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
32
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Tahiti
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy