Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD FirePro W5130M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD FirePro W5130M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5130M 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +74%
1.651 TFLOPS
FirePro W5130M
0.947 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Oct 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
947.2 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Tropo
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Tropo LE
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy