Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +98%
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.680 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
833.3 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GK107
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
GT 755M
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net