Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +86%
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GF104
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N12E-GTX-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy