AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
+33%
2.209 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Oct 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.01 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.03 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.209 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.03 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
122W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
GK104
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX2-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
