Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870

AMD FirePro W6150M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4870 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 56.83GB/s)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +87%
1.651 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
0.88 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
888 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
56.83GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
880.0 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
176.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
M98
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
M98 XT L2 (216-0732023)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy