Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +4133%
1.651 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
11W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GT218
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy