AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon 620 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon 620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1024MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
+110%
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon 620 Mobile
0.786 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.192 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.58 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
786.4 GFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
786.4 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
49.15 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
Polaris 24
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Polaris 24 XL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
