Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon E6465

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon E6465

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +759%
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Sep 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
160
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Caicos
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy