Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon HD 7950M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon HD 7950M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon HD 7950M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950M +8%
1.792 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
London
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.792 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Wimbledon
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Wimbledon PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy