AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1397%
24.72 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W6150M
1452
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+967%
15495
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
58
768
Shading Units
7424
48
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
110W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
AD104
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
