Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +148%
4.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
TU116
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy