Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs Intel Arc A350M

AMD FirePro W6170M vs Intel Arc A350M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M +11%
1.971 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
DG2-128
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy