Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q

AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
1.983 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2018
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1152 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.97 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.98 GFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.983 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.97 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GP107
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N17P-G1-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net