Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X

AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 94.08GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 560X +4%
2.056 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2018
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1470 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
94.08GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
16
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.06 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.056 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.056 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
3 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy