Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation +1987%
41.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1425 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
896
Shading Units
9728
56
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
41.15 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
41.15 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
643.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
AD103
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy