Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD FirePro S9050

AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050 +32%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
28
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy