Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +733%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
72
1280
Shading Units
4608
80
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 21
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy