Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X +68%
4.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tonga
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy