Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +192%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Polaris 30
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy