Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +246%
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
8
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy