Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
28
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tonga
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy