Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +1856%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
5376
112
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Navi 31
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy