Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +67%
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Bonaire
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy