Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7170M +126%
2.961 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
12
2048
Shading Units
960
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Amethyst XT GL
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy