CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
VS
AMD FirePro W7170M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1245MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
+416%
15.3 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M
VS
GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q
Graphics Card
Oct 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1245 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
119.5 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.0 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.30 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.30 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
239.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GA104
Amethyst XT GL
GPU Variant
GA104-775-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
100W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs AMD FirePro W7170M
2
AMD Radeon RX 6300M vs AMD FirePro W7170M
3
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD FirePro W7170M
4
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD FirePro W7170M
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W7170M
6
AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs AMD FirePro W7170M
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs AMD FirePro W7170M
8
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
9
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
10
AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy