CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
VS
AMD FirePro W7170M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
+463%
16.7 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M
VS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
Graphics Card
Oct 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
58
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
7424
128
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
261.0 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.70 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.70 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
261.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GA103S
Amethyst XT GL
GPU Variant
GN20-E8-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Board Design
100W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD Radeon HD 7670M Rebrand
2
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M
3
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
4
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition
5
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
6
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
7
AMD FirePro W7170M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
8
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce 705M
9
AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe
10
AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy