Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs Intel Arc A350

AMD FirePro W8000 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +5%
3.226 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy