Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

AMD FirePro W8000 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +49%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy