Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +501%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
216
112
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy