Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +255%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460
0.907 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
1792
Shading Units
336
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.450 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
907.2 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF104
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy