Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +8171%
3.226 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT218
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
18W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy