Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +165%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy