Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (200W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +3%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
28
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy