Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +77%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Vesuvius
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy