Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs Intel Arc A750

AMD FirePro W8100 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (220W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +307%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
3584
160
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-512
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy