Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +17%
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 24
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy