Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +9275%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

220W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy