Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +48%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
896
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU116
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy