Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD FirePro W8100 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV560
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

220W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy