Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +285%
4.219 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU117
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

220W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy